Legal Opinion
Baker v. St. Paul Travelers Insurance
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 28, 2012No. 11-1897PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
In 2010, we remanded this state law insurance action for appropriate discovery on the narrow question of whether plaintiff-appellant Heidi M. Baker’s employer “explicitly purchased” underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage from defendant-appellee St. Paul Travelers Insurance Company (St. Paul) for the purpose of providing such coverage to employees like Baker who are injured in the course of their employment. After that discovery occurred, the district court denied Baker’s motion to compel further discovery and for sanctions against St. Paul, and the court granted summary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Harriman v. Hancock CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Black Horse Lane Assoc., L.P. v. Dow Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- R.W. International Corp. And T. H. Ward De La Cruz, Inc. v. Welch Foods, Inc. And Magna Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of First Bankers Trust and Savings Association, F.A. v. Southern Union Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Pina v. Children's PlaceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Manganella v. Evanston Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Evanston Insurance Company v. Jasmine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Ezenia! Inc. v. Nguyen (In re Ezenia! Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- Grajales v. Puerto Rico Ports AuthortiyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.