Adams v. Kelly Springfield Tire Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
This appeal is flawed by numerous and substantial errors of appellate procedure. Our Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory and subject an appeal to dismissal. N.C.R. App. P. 10 (1996); Marsico v. Adams, 47 N.C. App. 196, 197, 266 S.E.2d 696, 697-98 (1980). Defendants have brought forward eleven assignments of error (AOE), none of which state the page of the record where the alleged error occurred. An assignment of error must “direct[] the attention of the appellate court to the particular error about which the question is made, with clear and specific record or transcript…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- McLean v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Cates v. Hunt Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Bustle v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tucker v. Workable Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Matthews v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Onslow County v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Bobbitt v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Bobbitt v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.