Legal Opinion

Shook v. County of Buncombe

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1997No. COA96-109PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiff failed to comply with the appellate rules of this Court, and for this reason, we dismiss. Our rules require appellant to present a record in final form and complete. N.C.R. App. P. 9(a)(1)(e) and Q) (1997); Pharr v. Worley, 125 N.C. App. 136, 139, 479 S.E.2d 32, 34 *285(1997). In the instant appeal, plaintiff has failed to assign any error whatsoever in the record on appeal as required by N.C.R. App. P. 10(a) (1997) and 10(c)(1) (1997). See Muse v. Charter Hosp. of Winston-Salem, Inc., 117 N.C. App. 468, 481, 452 S.E.2d 589, 598, disc. review denied, 340 N.C. 114, 455…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Bustle v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Muse v. Charter Hospital of Winston-Salem, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Pharr v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. StaplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Progressive American Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Holland v. HeavnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Holland Group, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of AdministrationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Viar v. N.C. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Duke University v. BishopCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API