Legal Opinion

Falk v. Falk

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1941No. Civ. No. 6646PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant has appealed from that portion of a decree of divorce which awards one-half of the community property to the plaintiff. She was granted a divorce on the grounds of extreme cruelty and adultery. That portion of the decree is not challenged.

The appellant contends there is no community property subject to distribution for the reason that the overhead expenses of conducting defendant’s profession and business, together with the cost of living, consumed all the funds from which the determined community stocks, bonds and securities were deemed to have been purchased. It is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Cavagnaro v. DelmasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Wittman v. WittmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Peebler v. OldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Nilsson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Agdeppa v. GlougieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Nilsson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API