Legal Opinion
Heathcote Associates v. Chittenden Trust Co.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided January 29, 1997No. 2:96-cv-00128PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
This is an action in diversity arising out of a contract dispute between Plaintiff Heath-cote Associates (“Heathcote”) and Defendant Chittenden Trust Company (“Chittenden”). Heathcote seeks specific performance as well as damages for Chittenden’s alleged breach of contract. Heathcote has also alleged claims of failure to deal in good faith under the contract, fraud, and promissory estoppel. Pending before the Court is Chittenden’s Motion to Dismiss, which Heathcote opposes. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Prue v. Royer, Sr., and Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Citibank N.A. v. City of BurlingtonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
- Roberts v. KarimiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Toledo Electrical Welfare Fund v. Northwest Ohio Buckeye Electric, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Haig v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.