State ex rel. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Missouri Public Service Commission
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
In this appeal by a utility company from an order involving a rate increase, the primary issue presented is whether the regulatory body may, as sanctions for enforcement of discovery, Rule 61.01, strike crucial evidence of the applicant.
Arkansas Power & Light Company (AP & L), a wholesale and retail electric supplier, has a service area in eight southeastern Missouri counties. AP & L is one of four operating electrical companies wholly owned by a holding company, Middle South Utilities (MSU).
AP & L, based on revenue requirements, under Chapter 393, RSMo 1986 wanted to raise…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Utility Consumers Council of Missouri, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Detroit-Chicago Motor Bus Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Associated Natural Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Petition of Central Vt. Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. GTE North, Inc. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State ex rel. Missouri Office of the Public Counsel v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Noranda Aluminium, Inc. v. Public Service Com'n of StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State ex rel. Office of the Public Counsel v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- In the Matter of the Application of Rate Increase Request for Liberty Utilities (Missouri Water), LLC d/b/a Liberty Utilities Orange Lake Country Club, Inc., and Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019