Legal Opinion

Hanks v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1964No. Civ. 27977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

This case is companion to Michels v. Watson, ante, p. 404 [40 Cal.Rptr. 464] 2d Civil No. 27835, this day decided. Plaintiff, a taxpayer and owner of a single family residence, filed a petition for writ of mandate to require defendant State Board of Equalization to increase assessment rolls of all counties of the state for 1962-63 and 1963-64 fiscal years, and all future years, to make them conform to full cash value. No oral proceedings other than argument were had in the trial court; however, introduced as Exhibit 1 was a release of the State Board of Equalization, dated September 11, 1962,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Hyatt v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. People ex rel. Colorado Tax Commission v. PitcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  5. Houghton v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Harris County Appraisal District v. United Investors Realty Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. County of Amador v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Wunderlich v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API