Hanks v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
This case is companion to Michels v. Watson, ante, p. 404 [40 Cal.Rptr. 464] 2d Civil No. 27835, this day decided. Plaintiff, a taxpayer and owner of a single family residence, filed a petition for writ of mandate to require defendant State Board of Equalization to increase assessment rolls of all counties of the state for 1962-63 and 1963-64 fiscal years, and all future years, to make them conform to full cash value. No oral proceedings other than argument were had in the trial court; however, introduced as Exhibit 1 was a release of the State Board of Equalization, dated September 11, 1962,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Hyatt v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Colorado Tax Commission v. PitcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Houghton v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Harris County Appraisal District v. United Investors Realty Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- County of Amador v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Wunderlich v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.