Legal Opinion
International Shoe Co. v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 14, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Richardson
Reversing,
This is the second appeal of this case. Johnson v. International Shoe Company, 228 Ky. 450, 15 S. W. (2d) 270. The nature and sufficiency of the contract claimed to have been made by Johnson with a traveling salesman of the International Shoe Company are stated in our former opinion. An examination of it discloses that the basis of his claim was that by contract the International Shoe Company agreed not to sell its shoes to any other merchant engaged in business at Jackson, Ky., so long as he carried same in stock; that he executed the contract…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caddy Oil Co. v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Short v. Metz Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Nolin Milling Co. v. White Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Peaslee-Gaulbert Company v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Linda Holt v. John GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- International Shoe Co. v. DawaHare's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
- Linda Holt v. John GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017