Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 29, 1956No. 2PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Among the assignments of error presented by appellant on this appeal, the case on appeal shows that Number Three is based upon exception of like number. It is well taken. It relates to incident which occurred during the course of the trial, narrated as follows:

“During the course of his argument to the jury the Solicitor argued that the defendants had not put up any evidence to show that they were not present in North Carolina at Forest City on the night that Matheny Motor Company was robbed and that their mothers and fathers and brothers and sisters were not here in court to show where they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. McLamb v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. State v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. . HawleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . HowleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. McCallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API