Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 19, 2012No. AC 33454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The self-represented plaintiff, Alfred P. Mayo, appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his appeal from a decision of the employment security board of review (board). On appeal, the plaintiff asserts procedural claims regarding the fairness of the hearing before the appeals referee. He also claims, on the merits, that the appeals referee’s decision denying him unemployment compensation benefits was incorrect as was the subsequent decision of the board affirming the decision of the appeals referee, and that the court incorrectly dismissed his appeal. We affirm the…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Oakland Heights Mobile Park, Inc. v. SimonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Belica v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Tosado v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  2. Phillips v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API