Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Dana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The action is by a stockholder of The Fisk Rubber Corporation, suing on his own behalf and on behalf of other stockholders similarly situated, against the directors of that corporation and certain others, “ in the right of said The Fisk Rubber Corporation ” for damages due to alleged misconduct of the defendants to the detriment of The Fisk Rubber Corporation.

Ordinarily a complaint may not be dismissed before answer because of defect of parties. Here, however, in order that plaintiff, as a stockholder, may state a derivative cause of action, it is an integral part of such statement that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Niles v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Greaves v. . GougeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Whalen v. General Mining, Milling & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. DanaNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Cohen v. DanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API