Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Dana

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

Appeal is taken to this court by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing the complaint entered upon the order of the Appellate Division.

As the complaint has been dismissed before answer, we are compelled to take the allegations as if proven true. The complaint alleges that the action is brought “ for the benefit and in the right of said The Fisk Rubber Corporation and for the benefit and in the right of all stockholders of the common stock of the Fisk Rubber Corporation ” (hereinafter called Fisk) against the directors of that corporation and certain other third parties, all of whom it is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cohen v. DanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reed v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Carruthers v. Jack Waite Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Weinert v. KinkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Swinton v. W. J. Bush & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Norman v. General American Transportation Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API