Legal Opinion
Pitzen v. Pitzen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 10, 1930No. Nos. 28,046, 28,047Published
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Two actions, one by Kate Pitzen and tbe other by Nicholas M. Pitzen, both against Werner C. Pitzen. The action of Kate Pitzen is for damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision while riding with her son. The plaintiff Nicholas M. Pitzen is the husband of Kate Pitzen and sues for damages consequent upon the injuries to his wife. There was a verdict of $1,800 for the plaintiff Kate Pitzen and of $1,200 for the plaintiff Nicholas M. Pitzen. The defendant moved in each case for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The motion for a new trial was granted in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gibbs v. AlmstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Lammers v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Maroney v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Armstrong v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cuyuna Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- McNab v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.