Legal Opinion

In Re Marshall W. Cronyn

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 29, 1989No. 89-1434Published

1Opinion of the Court

890 F.2d 1158

58 USLW 2376, 57 Ed. Law Rep. 405, 13

U.S.P.Q.2d 1070

In re Marshall W. CRONYN.

No. 89-1434.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

Nov. 29, 1989.

Peter J. Dehlinger, Palo Alto, Cal., argued for appellant.

Nancy C. Slutter, Associate Sol., Office of the Sol., Arlington, Va., argued for appellee. With her on the brief was Fred E. McKelvey, Sol., Woodbridge, Va.

Before FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge,* and ARCHER and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

1

The sole question in this case is whether the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) correctly held…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. In Re Leo M. HallCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. In re WyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  5. In Re Marshall W. CronynCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API