Legal Opinion

Rienhardt v. Kelly

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1999No. 96-2161, 97-2143PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

William Rienhardt, a resident of California, sued Tom and Hilda Kelly, residents of New Mexico, in diversity in federal district court for tortious interference with inheritance, a tort under New Mexico common law. Mr. Rienhardt won a jury verdict against the Kellys for $200,000 and was awarded costs against them in the amount of $9,981.06. The jury found that the other two named defendants, Marvin Gard and Don Klein, were not liable, and Mr. Rienhardt did not appeal that verdict.

In appeal 96-2161, the Kellys petition this court for relief from the jury verdict on several…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Amanatullah v. Colorado Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Weitzel v. Division of Occupational & Professional Licensing of the Department of Commerce of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. D.A. Osguthorpe Family Partnership v. ASC Utah, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API