Legal Opinion

Weitzel v. Division of Occupational & Professional Licensing of the Department of Commerce of Utah

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 24, 2001No. 99-4214PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the district court’s abstention under the doctrine of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 1

I. Facts

Prior to August 24, 1999, the appellant, Robert A. Weitzel, M.D., was licensed to practice psychiatry by the appellee, Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing (the Division), a division of the Department of Commerce of the State of Utah. The Division had authorized Dr. Weitzel to practice medicine and to prescribe and administer controlled substances…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. D.L. v. Unified School District No. 497Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Walck v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Fisher v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API