Weitzel v. Division of Occupational & Professional Licensing of the Department of Commerce of Utah
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff appeals the district court’s abstention under the doctrine of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 1
I. Facts
Prior to August 24, 1999, the appellant, Robert A. Weitzel, M.D., was licensed to practice psychiatry by the appellee, Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing (the Division), a division of the Department of Commerce of the State of Utah. The Division had authorized Dr. Weitzel to practice medicine and to prescribe and administer controlled substances…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- D.L. v. Unified School District No. 497Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Walck v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Fisher v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.