Legal Opinion

SHAQRAN v. BLINKEN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01406Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MUNEER ALI KSAIM SHAQRAN, CIVIL ACTION MALEK MUNEER ALI SHAQRAN, NUSAIBAH MUNEER ALI SHAQRAN, SHAYMAA MUNEER ALI SHAQRAN, MOHAMED ABDO MOZAYID, and DHANINAH NAJI SAIF SENAN, NO. 23-1406 Plaintiffs, v. ANTONY BLINKEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES EMBASSY CAIRO, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This is a suit seeking mandamus relief and money damages from Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the United States, and several federal agency Defendants. In brief, Plaintiffs—…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API