Legal Opinion
State v. Kingman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1970No. 40888PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
By writ of certiorari, the state seeks review of an order denying its petition for an order of public use and necessity.
The petition alleges:
That the Director of Highways ... as authorized by resolution of the Washington State Highway Commission, has surveyed, located, selected and adopted part of the route of SR 97 . . . over, across and/or adjacent to certain lands . . . contain [ing] an area of 1.06 acres, more or less . . .
and that the property
is necessary for a public use of the State of Washington, to wit: the improvement of SR 97.
It appears from briefs of counsel (a) that the land to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Rutter v. RutterWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Lange v. SUP. CT. FOR KING CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Quigley v. BarashWashington Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by15 opinions
- Little v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Peoples National Bank v. Birney's Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Kinney v. BauchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- City of Blaine v. FeldsteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- City of Blaine v. FeldsteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.