Legal Opinion

City of Blaine v. Feldstein

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 15, 2005No. 55837-4-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*75¶1 Under the Washington State Constitution, a city may condemn private property for public uses. Here, the city of Blaine (City) petitioned to condemn property to build a public boardwalk in downtown Blaine. Because (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that an evidentiary hearing was not required, (2) a public boardwalk constitutes a public use under RCW 8-.12.030, (3) the particular boardwalk proposed by the City constitutes a public use, and (4) there is no evidence that the City’s determination of necessity was arbitrary and capricious, we affirm the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. WelckerWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re Petition of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Des Moines v. HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State ex rel. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Seattle v. Mall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Blaine v. FeldsteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. City of Bellevue v. Pine Forest Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Cowlitz County v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. City Of Bellevue v. Best Buy StoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Foster v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API