City of Blaine v. Feldstein
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*75¶1 Under the Washington State Constitution, a city may condemn private property for public uses. Here, the city of Blaine (City) petitioned to condemn property to build a public boardwalk in downtown Blaine. Because (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that an evidentiary hearing was not required, (2) a public boardwalk constitutes a public use under RCW 8-.12.030, (3) the particular boardwalk proposed by the City constitutes a public use, and (4) there is no evidence that the City’s determination of necessity was arbitrary and capricious, we affirm the trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. WelckerWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re Petition of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Des Moines v. HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Seattle v. Mall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Blaine v. FeldsteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- City of Bellevue v. Pine Forest Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Cowlitz County v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- City Of Bellevue v. Best Buy StoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Foster v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.