Quigley v. Barash
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
— This is an action for an accounting, and upon a trial before the court judgment was entered in favor of the defendant in the sum of $134.88. The statement of facts having heretofore been stricken, the only question before this court is whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law and judgment.
The findings of fact are somewhat numerous and need not be set out in detail, but it is sufficient to say that the court found that the parties had entered into-a partnership in 1922 for the purpose of carrying on in Seattle a business known as “Totem Tours,” the business of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wishkah Boom Co. v. Greenwood Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Ritter v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Clifford v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. KingmanWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Foltz v. MansonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.