Cockrum v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JUSTICE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The applicant in the above-entitled and numbered civil action moves for a protective order. A hearing on the motion was held on January 5, 1996, and the parties were given leave to submit post-trial briefs. After considering the briefs and the testimony, both that offered at the hearing and that submitted by deposition, it is found that the motion for protective order should be granted in part and denied in part.
II. Background
Sometime soon after he was sentenced to death, John Cockrum, the applicant in this habeas corpus action, began writing to his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dapper v. Brinderson LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Menard v. Targa Resources LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020