Legal Opinion

Cockrum v. Johnson

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided February 12, 1996No. 6:93 cv 230PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JUSTICE, District Judge.

I. Introduction

The applicant in the above-entitled and numbered civil action moves for a protective order. A hearing on the motion was held on January 5, 1996, and the parties were given leave to submit post-trial briefs. After considering the briefs and the testimony, both that offered at the hearing and that submitted by deposition, it is found that the motion for protective order should be granted in part and denied in part.

II. Background

Sometime soon after he was sentenced to death, John Cockrum, the applicant in this habeas corpus action, began writing to his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dapper v. Brinderson LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  2. Menard v. Targa Resources LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API