Legal Opinion

Miller v. Poli's New England Theatres, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The Palace Theatre in Waterbury is owned and operated by the defendant as a moving picture theatre. The floor of the auditorium slants downward toward the stage. In consequence, beginning with the fourteenth row from the stage, twenty-nine rows of seats to the rear rest on platforms elevated above the aisle, the elevations increasing gradually until the platform on which the last row of seats rests is seven and one-half inches above the aisle. In the afternoon of November 27, 1937, the plaintiff and her sister entered as patrons and selected seats in the rear row, the plaintiff occupying the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Givens v. De Soto Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Seabridge v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  3. Haugh v. Harris Bros. Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Rosston v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Knapp v. Connecticut Theatrical Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Cassanova v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  3. Eamiello v. PiscitelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  4. Olsen v. John Hamrick's Tacoma TheatresWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bergstresser v. Minnesota Amusement Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API