Legal Opinion

Baugh & Sons Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

The issue presented is whether the liability of an obligor upon a bond given to discharge an attachment survives its annulment, by reason of a dismissal of the complaint and the failure to procure a stay of proceedings pending appeal which results in a new trial.

In an action wherein plaintiff was defendant and the Crowell Corporation plaintiff, an attachment levied on said defendant’s property was discharged upon the undertaking of defendant herein. The obligation of the bond was “ that the defendant Baugh and Sons *732Company [plaintiff herein] will pay any judgment which may be finally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. TurrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Hamilton v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Youngman v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Flick v. Wyoming Valley Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Youngman v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lutes v. ShenkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Baugh & Sons Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Fried v. Continental Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  4. The Federal Rubber Co. v. PruettArizona Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API