Legal Opinion

The Federal Rubber Co. v. Pruett

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1940No. Civil No. 4043Published

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Plaintiff herein filed petition in this court for recall of the judgment and mandate heretofore transmitted to the trial court, and asked for a temporary order restraining the trial judge from rendering judgment on the mandate. The temporary restraining order was issued, but the recall of the mandate was deferred pending a determination of the questions involved.

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a corporation, hereinafter called protestant, appeared specially for the purpose of objecting to the jurisdiction of this court to modify its mandate upon any recall thereof by amending or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koenig v. Curran's Restaurant & Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Maxwell v. Bank of New RichmondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hamilton v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Turner v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Washer v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API