Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co. v. Huncheon
Indiana Supreme Court
From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.
The appellees are the owners of one thousand acres of land in one body in Laporte county. The land is crossed by two lines'of railroad other than that of the appellant. The Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway crosses it from north to south, and the Chicago, St. Louis and Pittsburgh Railroad crosses it from east to west. The appellant sought to appropriate a strip for its right of way, crossing the land from northeast to southwest. The necessary steps were taken under the statute; but the award of the arbitrators was unsatisfactory to the appellees. They filed exceptions, the cause was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Bigelow v. West Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Hartshorn v. B., C. R. & N. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Welch v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Richard S. Brunt Trust v. PlantzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Howard v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Meyer v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.