Legal Opinion
Perry v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1955No. Civ. 20376PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendant city of Santa Monica entered on the sustaining of a demurrer to the first amended complaint, referred to as the complaint, without leave to amend.
The complaint alleges:
On April 1, 1953, at 7:40 a. m., plaintiffs were passengers in an automobile driven by Aleck Penny who was traveling north on Euclid Avenue near Michigan Avenue in Santa Monica. At the same time, Joann Cesario negligently drove an automobile west on Michigan Avenue and collided with the automobile being driven by Penny. As a proximate result of such negligence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Rose v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Charles W. Driscoll v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Teall v. City of CudahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Dudum v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Rodgers v. RayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.