Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

H. Herfurth, Jr., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 29, 1939No. 43338PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Judge

This suit is brought by the plaintiff to recover the reasonable value of work performed and materials furnished in connection with the installation of a boiler plant at the Navy Yard, Washington, D. G.

The contract for the work at the Navy Yard was awarded to George W. Stetson, Jr., as the lowest bidder for a stated sum and Stetson was to execute a formal contract which was to be prepared and forwarded to him at an early date. This formal contract was forwarded to him on November 16,1933, and required the furnishing of a performance bond to accompany the return of the signed contract to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Alexander v. Ala. Wes. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Pneumatic Gun-Carriage & Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901
  4. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. New York Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Severin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. United Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Produce Factors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. George Hyman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API