Legal Opinion

Mushero v. Lincoln Pulp & Paper Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 9, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

The employee, Ralph Mushero, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting his petition for an award of compensation but permitting his employer to reduce its liability for Mushero’s total incapacity by that portion of incapacity attributable to a subsequent nonwork-related injury. 39 M.R.S.A. § 51(4) (Supp.1992). 1 Mushero contends that because the work and nonwork-injuries were related to the same body part and contributed to his incapacitated condition, the injuries must be said to be “causally connected” for purposes of subsection 51(4), and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Richardson v. Robbins Lumber, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  3. Brackett v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Curtis v. National Sea ProductsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. LaRochelle v. Crest Shoe Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lamonica v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Pratt v. Fraser Paper, Ltd.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Clukey v. Piscataquis County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. Roy v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  5. Pratt v. Fraser Paper, Ltd.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API