Legal Opinion

Roy v. Bath Iron Works

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 10, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Joseph A. Roy appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Knopf, HO) discontinuing his total incapacity benefits. Roy contends that the hearing officer erred in interpreting 39-A M.R.S. § 201(5) (2007) to require that his benefits be terminated because he suffers from a subsequent, non-work-related medical condition that is totally disabling, even though he also suffers continuing total incapacity as a result of his work injuries. We vacate the hearing officer’s decision.

I. CASE HISTORY

[¶ 2] Roy, a long-time employee of Bath Iron Works (BIW), suffered an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Board of Counseling Professionals LicensureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  2. Arsenault v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. McGee v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  5. Bernier v. Data General Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carol Brewster v. S.D. Warren/Sappi N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API