Roy v. Bath Iron Works
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Joseph A. Roy appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Knopf, HO) discontinuing his total incapacity benefits. Roy contends that the hearing officer erred in interpreting 39-A M.R.S. § 201(5) (2007) to require that his benefits be terminated because he suffers from a subsequent, non-work-related medical condition that is totally disabling, even though he also suffers continuing total incapacity as a result of his work injuries. We vacate the hearing officer’s decision.
I. CASE HISTORY
[¶ 2] Roy, a long-time employee of Bath Iron Works (BIW), suffered an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cobb v. Board of Counseling Professionals LicensureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Arsenault v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- McGee v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Bernier v. Data General Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carol Brewster v. S.D. Warren/Sappi N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026