Curtis Eng'g Corp. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtNares, J.
*545Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 411.35 requires the attorney for plaintiffs or cross-complainants in certain professional negligence cases to serve and file a certificate on the defendant or cross-defendant on or before the date of service of the complaint or cross-complaint declaring that he or she has consulted with and received an opinion from an expert in the field, or an adequate excuse for not doing so. ( §§ 411.35, subd. (a), (b).) In this case, we conclude that a certificate filed after expiration of the statute of limitations and more than 60 days after filing the original pleading…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Akella v. The Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Ayers v. FCA US, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Gunther v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Humboldt Waste Management Authority v. GHD CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re D.L.California Court of Appeal · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.