Legal Opinion

Curtis Eng'g Corp. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 23, 2017No. D072046PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNares, J.

*545Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 411.35 requires the attorney for plaintiffs or cross-complainants in certain professional negligence cases to serve and file a certificate on the defendant or cross-defendant on or before the date of service of the complaint or cross-complaint declaring that he or she has consulted with and received an opinion from an expert in the field, or an adequate excuse for not doing so. ( §§ 411.35, subd. (a), (b).) In this case, we conclude that a certificate filed after expiration of the statute of limitations and more than 60 days after filing the original pleading…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Akella v. The Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Ayers v. FCA US, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Gunther v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Humboldt Waste Management Authority v. GHD CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. In re D.L.California Court of Appeal · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API