Legal Opinion
Granger v. Hurt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2004No. 02-3088PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns the appropriate application of the one-year statute of limitations governing federal habeas corpus relief sought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court’s Certificate of Appeala-bility (COA) states the question as “whether the running of the statute of limitations period was tolled during the two-month period between the entry of judgment of conviction and petitioner’s learning that his trial attorney had not filed a notice of appeal.” A negative answer was rendered by the district court. For the reasons set forth below, we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James R. Kincade v. Emmit L. Sparkman, Warden Commonwealth of Kentucky, Anthony L. Hereford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Harold McQueen Jr. v. Gene Scroggy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- John C. Wims v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Parrish Searcy v. Harold Carter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Charles Northrop v. David Trippett, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Alfred L. Dicenzi v. Norman Rose, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- In Re McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Ryan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Leslie Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Steward v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.