Legal Opinion

State v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 14, 1996No. 95-615PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

We granted the State’s application for discretionary review of the district court’s ruling on the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of his vehicle. Although the court found the defendant had been legally stopped for speeding and legally arrested on an outstanding warrant that later turned out to be improperly outstanding, it granted the motion to suppress because it found “there was no probable cause to search defendant’s vehicle incident to his arrest.” We find the search was a valid search incident to arrest and therefore reverse the court’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. State v. HuismanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Rhodes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  5. State v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API