Legal Opinion
State v. Huisman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 14, 1996No. 94-1655PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
The State charged appellant, Tammy Jean Huisman, with possession of a controlled substance and failure to affix a drug tax stamp after the police discovered methamphet-amines during an inventory search of her car. See Iowa Code §§ 124.401(l)(c)(6), 453B.12 (1993). The district court granted Huisman’s motion to suppress the evidence found during the vehicle search. The court concluded the search violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because the impoundment of Huisman’s car was improper. We granted the State’s application for discretionary review.
We…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. BreuerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. AtleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- State v. JonasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- State v. MilnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.