Rhodes v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC
FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.
Curtis S. Rhodes appealed the trial judge’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search. Rhodes contended the trial judge erred in holding that a police officer lawfully searched Rhodes incident to issuing him a summons for violating a city ordinance. A divided panel of this Court affirmed the trial judge’s refusal to suppress the evidence, see Rhodes v. Commonwealth, 28 Va. App. 296, 504 S.E.2d 390 (1998), and we granted rehearing en banc. Upon rehearing en banc, we reverse the trial court’s decision.
I
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Francisco Maria Mota, United States of America v. Juan Maria MotaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Stanley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lovelace v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- West v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Farrow v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Hunt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.