Legal Opinion
Hazeltine Corporation v. Abrams
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 29, 1935No. 278PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from, a decree in equity dismissing a bill to enjoin the infringement of claims 1, 5, 6 and 10 of patent No. 1,879,863, issued on September 27, 1932, to Harold A. Wheeler and assigned by him to the plaintiff. Judge Galston’s opinion below, reported in (D. C.) 7 F. Supp. 908, describes the invention accurately and fully, as well as the more important parts of the prior art. We reach the same result as he, and though we follow a somewhat different course, we adopt his statement in general. He thought that the claims should not be limited to receiving…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Technidyne Corp. v. McPhilben-Keator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Hazeltine Corporation v. AbramsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Murphy v. LintWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Detrola Radio & Television Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Detrola Radio & Televison Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- W. F. & John Barnes Co. v. International Harvester Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.