Legal Opinion

In Re Milton E. Herr

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 11, 1962No. 6811PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoeley, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of all three claims in appellant’s application for patent. 1 No claims were allowed.

Claim 1 is representative and reads:

1. 9(ll)-dehydro-17-alkyltestosterones represented by the following formula

wherein R' is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and the acyl radical of a hydrocarbon carboxylic acid containing from one to twelve carbon atoms, inclusive, and wherein R is a lower-alkyl group containing less than three carbon atoms; and the 3-pyrrolidyl enamines thereof.

The single…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. In re LundbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. Application of Milton E. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. In re DaviesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. Application of Bernard L. ZenitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Application of Milton E. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API