Legal Opinion

Verhaar v. Consumers Power Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1989No. Docket 106360PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals by leave granted from an order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion for summary disposition.

Appellant is the parent corporation of Clifton Engineering Company, plaintiff’s employer. In the course of his employment for Clifton, Roger Verhaar was injured when he fell from a crane bucket. The crane was owned by appellant Rowen & Blair, but maintained by Clifton.

Rowen & Blair and Clifton Engineering are insured, for workers’ compensation purposes, under a single policy, pursuant to which Roger Verhaar received disability benefits. The two corporations have interlocking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wodogaza v. H & R Terminals, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. White v. Central Transport, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Parkkonen v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Nardi v. American Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. McQuade v. Draw Tite, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Clark v. United Technologies Automotive, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Trinity Hospitals v. MattsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. James v. Commercial Carriers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API