Preacher v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Following a jury trial, appellant, Lawrence A. Preacher, was convicted of manslaughter while armed, the lesser-included offense of second degree murder while armed, and carrying a dangerous weapon (CDW). His principal argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to answer the jury’s question about what constitutes an assault, in the context of that portion of the jury instructions explaining the circumstances for consideration in determining whether the use of deadly force was excessive, thereby resulting in the loss of appellant’s self-defense claim. We agree that the trial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Comber v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Harrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Campbell-Crane & Associates, Inc. v. StamenkovicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jeremiah Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- LAMONT L. BUSKEY and KEITH A. SIMMS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Plummer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.