Legal Opinion

Commonwealth of Mass. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1942No. 9041PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

On June 23, 1937, appellant, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, sued appel-lee, Edgar B. Davis, upon a Massachusetts income tax judgment, and on the same day ran a garnishment on the United North and South Development Company. On October 24, 1939, in an ancillary garnishment suit or proceeding, the trial court quashed the garnishment upon the motion of garnishee and the intervening defendant, Edgar B. Davis, because of certain alleged defects in the affidavit and garnishment bond; the answer of the garnishee having shown that Davis owned 186,751 of the 200,000 shares of the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. McNeill v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Smith v. DeckerTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United North & South Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. State v. NoserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API