Legal Opinion
Dunn v. City of Redmond
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1987No. LUBA 84-074; CA A40877; SC S33474PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
Oregon land use law assigns the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) “exclusive jurisdiction” to review a “land use decision,” including review of its constitutionality. ORS 197.825,197.835(8)(a)(E). In the present case, LUBA rejected claims of petitioner Don Dunn (respondent in this court) and an intervenor that certain ordinances adopted by the City of Redmond were invalid under the Oregon and United States Constitutions, primarily for taking their property without just compensation or depriving them of it without due process of law. Or Const, Art I, § 18; US Const, Amends 5, 14. 1 When…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Thomas Dodd and Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Nelson v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.