Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. Park

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1936No. Docket No. 14, Calendar No. 38,669PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Defendants had verdict of a jury and judgment in action of fraud to recover $2,000 and the value of 20 shares of stock in defendant bank.

Plaintiff owned 20 shares of stock of The Peoples State Bank of Caro. In December, 1931, defendant Park, then cashier and later president of the bank, came to plaintiff’s home and, she said, he told her, in substance, that the stockholders were required to pay into the bank a 100 per cent, assessment, and induced her to pay in $2,000.

Defendants claim the matter was presented to plaintiff as a plan of voluntary contribution. The court submitted the issue of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steele v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Stone v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Com. v. Tradesmen's Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Stone v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Schroeder v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sacred Heart Aid Society v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Commissioner of Banking v. BerryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Jensen v. Republic Steel Corp.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1940
  4. Granader v. Public BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1967
  5. Daugherty v. ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API