Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. Park

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1939No. Docket No. 98, Calendar No. 40,292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.

In a former trial, defendants bad a judgment in tbeir favor on tbe verdict of a jury, wbicb judgment was reversed and a new trial granted. See Daugherty v. Park, 274 Mich. 673. That action of fraud was for the purpose of recovering $2,000 paid by plaintiff and the value of 20 shares of stock in defendant bank. Defendants claimed the $2,000 was paid as voluntary contribution and as a part of a plan to rehabilitate the bank. The factual statement of the former opinion is applicable to the present appeal, except that, after a new trial was granted by this court, plaintiff filed an amended…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDuff v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Lamb v. LippincottMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Wessels v. BeemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Gumberg v. TreuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foodland Distributors v. Al-NaimiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Richardson v. BallMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Foodland Distributors v. Al-NaimiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API