Legal Opinion

Minot v. Baker

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 10, 1888PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a bill for instructions, brought by the administrator de bonis non, with the will annexed, of Captain John Perciyal. The will appointed John P. Healy executor, and gave the residue to Healy, “to be disposed of by him for such charitable purposes as he shall think proper.” Healy died, having disposed of only a small portion of the residuary estate in his hands for charitable purposes. The first question raised by the report is, “Whether the sum of $14,503.75, received by the plaintiff from the suit upon the bond of Healy, as executor of Percival’s estate, and from the suit against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Fontain v. RavenelSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. White v. DitsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Nichols v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. SchoulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Richards v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bullard v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Rose v. Third Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
  5. Stratton v. Physio-Medical CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API