Menapace v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Justice.
Presented for appeal decision is prosecu-torial discretion to choose whether serious criminal offense charges against a minor, seventeen years of age or older, can alternatively be either initiated as an adult or in juvenile court. The inquiry embraces pros-ecutorial discretion and forum for transfer hearings which is for a minor under seventeen confined to juvenile court and over seventeen may be pursued in criminal court by initial decision of the prosecutor.
John William Menapace, II (appellant) states his issue as:
Did the district court deny procedural due process to the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gerald, T. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- Hansen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BuelowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.