Hansen v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
In these consolidated cases, brought to this court in each instance by a petition for a writ of review, Arthur Hansen, Jr. (Hansen) and Derek Redstar Pappan (Pappan) seek to inhibit the discretion of the prosecuting attorney and the discretion of the trial court with respect to the prosecution of young offenders as adults in the district court. At the heart of the controversy is the discretion afforded the district attorney to initiate criminal proceedings against a juvenile in the district court or, alternatively, to seek the transfer to district court of a proceeding…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Sam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Dharminder Vir Sen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Vernier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Bear Cloud v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.