Billis v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1DissentUrbigkit, Chief Justice
We may as well provide two chairs on the bench during sentencing — one for the judge and one for the prosecutor — and be done with pretense. I dissent for two reasons. First, I would hold that Wyoming’s separation of powers provision1 prohibits the prosecutor from exercising any power over sentencing. Second, I would hold that the 1987 amendments to what is now W.S. 7-13-301 violate Wyo. Const, art. 3, §§ 20 and 24.
I. WHAT WE HAVE HERE AND WHY I WORRY!
The majority opinion can be breathtaking at times in the display of its scholastic strength. It is, however, an excellent answer to the wrong…
2Cases cited132 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.