Legal Opinion

Durham v. Foust

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1933No. 1166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

From a judgment for $370 with interest, and awarding foreclosure of a materialman’s lien on certain described lands, recovered by O. G. Foust, as plaintiff, in a suit against E. E. Durham and wife, as defendants, the latter have appealed.

Appellants contend that the suit is upon an open account, and a number of assignments are dependent upon whether that is the correct interpretation of the plaintiff’s petition. Appellee insists that the suit is upon a note and written contract. We are inclined to agree with the appellee that his purpose was to allege a cause of action…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pool v. SanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Texas & N. O. R. v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Wynne v. State National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Macdonell v. I. & G. N. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Elliott v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crow v. WillardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Crazy Water Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Grady v. Glen Walker, Collett & RiggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Glasgow v. De LappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API