Legal Opinion

In Re Rissman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1927No. Docket No. 1575PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The complaint in the municipal court contained at least an attempt to charge defendant therein with commission of the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses, a misdemeanor. Where this is so, and the jurisdiction challenged is that of a court of record, the failure to stqte all of the facts necessary to constitute such crime does not entitle the defendant to discharge by means of the writ of habeas corpus. (Ex parte Ruef, 150 Cal. 665 [89 Pac. 605].) The writ is available for that purpose in an inferior court. (In re Hernandez, 64 Cal. App. 71 [220 Pac. 423].)

But the constitution, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of RuefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. In Re HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re MacKay Ex Rel. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. In Re Tom WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Boyarsky v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Los Angeles County Employees Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API