Legal Opinion
Satterlund v. Murphy Bros', Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1995No. Civ. No. 5-93-183PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the Court, in accordance with the parties’ consent pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 686(c), upon the Motion of the Defendant Willbros Butler Engineers, Inc. (‘Willbros”), for the entry of Summary Judgment against the Plaintiffs or, in the alternative, against the Defendant Murphy Bro’s, Inc. (“Murphy”).
A Hearing on the Motion was conducted on July 13, 1995, at which Willbros appeared by Mark K. Blongewicz, Esq., Murphy and the Defendant Great Lakes Gas Transmission Company (“Great Lakes”) appeared by Steven W.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Trondson v. JanikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Thompson v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Casa De Cambio Comdiv, S.A. De C v. V. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, United States of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Casa De Cambi Comdiv v. Fed. Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997