State v. Jackson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendant first contends that the search in question took place before she had been arrested. This contention is clearly without merit. While it is not clear whether the arresting officers stated to the defendant that she was under arrest when they took her into custody, it is clear that defendant was deprived of her liberty when she was detained at the Biltmore Grill and later taken to jail. For the purposes of this case, her arrest was then complete. Henry v. United States, 361 U.S. 98, 4 L. Ed. 2d 134, 80 S.Ct. 168 (1959); State v. Tippett, 270 N.C. 588, 155 S.E. 2d 269…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.